New report and public database expose how Libyans continue to be robbed of millions of dollars of public funds through Letters of Credit fraud.
Meanwhile, deficiencies in anti-money laundering rules may be allowing this money to flow through the UK’s banking system.
Findings highlight need for financial transparency to be at the heart of the peace dialogue in Libya, greater oversight of central banks globally and stronger due diligence standards for correspondent banks in UK and internationally.
Global Witness reveals today how Libya appears to be losing millions of dollars a year through fraudulent use of its Letters of Credit system, run by the Central Bank of Libya. These deals are passing through correspondent banks in the heart of the City of London, with weaknesses in anti-money laundering rules leaving the UK’s banking system wide open to financial crime.
Letters of Credit (LCs) channel state oil dollars to fund the imports on which Libya relies. They provide the only official pipeline of foreign currency for Libyan businesses and public authorities to buy food, medicine, equipment and services from overseas. Yet the system has been widely abused since the 2011 revolution by powerful interests in Libya, including armed groups, business figures and political actors on all sides of the recent war.
Drawing on financial disclosures published on Facebook by the Central Bank of Libya, Global Witness has created a searchable database of nearly $2.5bn worth of LCs issued over 13 weeks between April and July 2020.
“Our investigation and ground-breaking database sheds new light on the flow of funds from Libya’s Letters of Credit system, revealing the scale of the fraud and following the money trail from Libya to London and beyond,” said Colin Tinto, Senior Consultant Adviser at Global Witness.
Using this newly created database, as well as source interviews with businessmen and former government officials and a wide range of public and confidential material, Global Witness’s report, Discredited, found that:
- During this period, Libyan LC money was exiting Libya far faster than the relevant goods had historically come in, likely pointing to ongoing financial crime, at significant cost to Libyan public finances. In one notable example, the value of approved LCs for meat over the 13 weeks exceeded the entire annual value of meat exports to Libya for the entire duration of each of 2016, 2017 and 2018.
- Sources described a variety of abuses of the LC system, including trade mispricing, money laundering, public procurement fraud and arbitrage on Libya’s diverging exchange rates, creating illicit profits from public funds.
- Questions about LC governance extend into government procurement. Our report explores how a $110m LC for power generators was diverted to an unrelated UAE company via a tweak in the contractor name. The money had begun to be paid out through a Libyan-owned bank in London before the LC was stopped “on suspicion of corruption”.
- Most Libyan LCs enter the international financial system via London-based ABC International Bank PLC, a commercial bank indirectly owned by the Central Bank of Libya and chaired by its Governor, Saddek Elkaber. Such a position is highly unusual for a Central Bank Governor and a clear conflict of interest, given Governor Elkaber’s authority over LCs and anti-money laundering regulation within Libya.
- Serious loopholes in the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist finance rules for “correspondent banks” could be rendering them ineffective in identifying trade finance fraud, conflict finance and other types of financial crime.
Our revelations come as Libya is at a crossroads, with a tentative ceasefire in place, attempts to form a new government underway and national elections scheduled for later this year. Having developed outsized influence over public spending, Libya’s Central Bank finds itself at the heart of an institutional power struggle over the country’s foreign currency accounts and access to oil and gas revenues.
“It is clear that Libya’s letters of credit system has been abused on a huge scale, and it is the Libyan public who are picking up the tab,” said Tinto.
Beyond Libya, our revelations also highlight a growing global tension between central bank independence and oversight. From capital and exchange controls to financial sector bailouts following the 2008 crash, central banks are increasingly acting as conduits for direct handouts of cash in support of national economies. This trend has accelerated significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic in many countries. Yet the oversight and accountability mechanisms for central banks have not caught up with this rapid expansion in their role.
“As their balance sheets balloon and their remits widen, central banks worldwide are putting ever greater amounts of public money into private hands,” said Tinto. “Citizens are entitled to greater accountability and transparency from central banks to ensure they know how state funds are being spent,” he added.
Our investigation also raises questions about the “due diligence” standards expected of London correspondent banks, which shuttle vast sums of money across borders. However, loopholes in the UK’s anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist finance rules – particularly around bank ownership – leave us with little confidence the system would reliably filter out LCs that are fraudulent, used for money laundering or connected to armed groups.
“Correspondent banking has long been seen as a weak point in international anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist finance defences, including in the UK. If the UK government is serious about stopping the proceeds of money laundering, conflict finance and organised crime flowing into the City, they must take action to strengthen the due diligence standards in London’s correspondent banks," said Tinto.
Global Witness is also calling on public authorities across Libya to put financial transparency at the heart of the peace dialogue, starting with foreign exchange disbursement systems such as LCs. This will be essential for helping build trust in public institutions as Libya stands at a pivotal moment politically and economically.
“We are publishing our open source database in the hope that Libyan law enforcement, journalists and citizens can use it to track where public money is going so that there is greater accountability in the Letters of Credit system,” said Tinto.
“The Central Bank of Libya’s letter of credit disclosures to date are a positive step. The Central Bank and Libya’s governing authorities should build on this by publishing LC data according to open data principles, publishing public sector LCs and showing the end destination of all LC money, which is crucial for cracking down on illicit financial flows,” concluded Tinto.